Critos Arguments to Plato Essays

Critos Arguments to Plato Essays Critos Arguments to Plato Essay Critos Arguments to Plato Essay Paper Topic: Contentions In spite of the fact that Crito has numerous substantial and factious purposes behind Socrates to get away, he is undaunted in his convictions and bites the dust a saint. Crito has three primary contentions for Socrates to get away from his detainment. Crito’s first contention is that if Socrates doesn't escape from jail he would free a dear companion. There is additionally the way that Crito’s notoriety would be harmed for not helping his companion escape from prison. The second contention that Crito has is that he fears that Socrates wouldn't like to escape since he wouldn't like to have his companions persevere through a similar discipline that he will. In the mean time his companions are happy to endure the outcomes of their activities. Socrates reacts to this with Crito additionally specifies that it is genuinely simple to take care of the gatekeepers who might rodent them out. Critos third and last contention to Socrates is that of his kids and how he is to be answerable for them and how it is his obligation to raise them and teach them. â€Å"Shrodes 786† Socrates contends with Crito that it is never acceptable to do shamefulness. Helping Socrates break would positively be doing a foul play and that is the reason Socrates wouldn't like to get away. Practically the entirety of the contentions Crito provides for Socrates are that with respect to people in general and what they would consider Socrates had he gotten away. Socrates being very wise and an exceptionally savvy man understands that he ought to tune in to what he accepts and not what the general population does and remain and be a saint. Truly I think Socrates was directly in saying the thing he said about in the event that he got away from how he wouldn’t be viewed as a saint and on the off chance that he did how the individuals would look downward on him and his name.

British nursery Essay

During the primary day, nothing of incredible intrigue appeared to occur. I was cited by a young lady toward the evening as having ‘big legs that way’ while being motioned to the sky and I found the course to the staff room yet other than that I appeared to have subsided into the working propensity before long. When I returned home I was depleted. I had a feeling that I had run a long distance race despite the fact that the working day was just 30 minutes longer than a school day and I had partaken in no physical action. Mum guaranteed that being with youngsters was significantly more troublesome than individuals figured it out. It positively made me fully aware of the educators around me that need to manage us consistently! As the week wore on I wound up nearly appreciating the easy days yet likewise wishing I had marginally more to do. I generally got the inclination from my two administrators that they had carried out this responsibility for such a large number of years that they believed they didn’t need me. I felt that I was ceaselessly offering my assistance however not to any extraordinary achievement. As sluggish as I am however, I get it was nearly my ideal fourteen days as I soon discovered that a staff preparing day was expected on the Friday and a strike was occurring the following Monday. A multi day fortnight, superb! My most exceedingly terrible second was during the main week when a specific kid about discharged his stomach substance over my leg while a kid anticipated that me should tidy his ‘accident’ up. At the point when three different instructors were in the room I felt it practically run of the mill that all the show transpired, the main person who didn’t understand what to do! Mrs Rusha was extremely decent, however, and offered to help asserting this to be the standard. The best difficulty I had was keeping my certainty up all through the position. Particularly when directing the meeting as accomplished as far as I can tell booklet. Conversing with the staff during noon was likewise very hard for me as I must be cautious about what I said so it didn’t blowback on my mum or the school. She had offered me guidance in advance, however, and clarified my duty so I knew to be mindful of what I said and did. The last day was certainly the one well on the way to remain in my memory the longest. A ‘Sponsored Bounce’ had been set up in the corridor and as I was the most youthful understudy, with exemption to the genuine little children, I had the pleasure of going with them. This was a yearly set up by the guardians relationship of two huge fun mansions for each youngster in the school. Admist the calls of enjoyment and a few cries of complete dread from the little children you could faintly hear the sound of a six foot young lady chuckling madly. It was extraordinary fun and I in the long run hauled different educators onto it with the goal that everybody was having a good time. I additionally got given an easter egg as a thank you which was contacting for me as I’d felt I hadn’t really done a lot. I trust my essence was esteemed by somebody there and that I may have shown a kid something they’ll always remember. The experience surely showed me a great deal, from helping me discover what instructors get up to outside the study hall to discovering how intense it truly is for nurseries to manage new Government gives constantly. (E. g. another jollyphonics conspire should now be instructed in each British nursery). I got a genuine understanding into working with kids and I found that in spite of the fact that the kids are unique and energizing each day, the activity isn’t. I couldn’t see myself turning into a nursery instructor as I need more difficulties and a superior possibility of movement in my activity. I totally respect instructors now and I’ve concluded that work concerning the two youngsters and game could be something I’m truly intrigued by. Until further notice anyway I mean to get to college for a games science certificate and to keep my choices open.

Buying books

Buying books Laura asked: where can you get inexpensive, used textbooks? one of my friends said she spent $700 on books alreadywe can find used books around here cant we? (sorry, Laura, I know you asked other questionsbut Ill answer this one first.) Ahh, never spend $700 on books! Thats CRAZY! If youre going to be taking the General Institute Requirements (a.k.a. introductory math, physics, chemistry, biologywhatever) just wait until you get to campus. There are always upperclassmen trying to sell books. Ask around your dorm, spam the email lists, and youll definitely hear of online book exchanges (MIT411.com used to be one of them, but it doesnt seem to be working anymore.) If nobody that you know has the book that you need, then you can get it off of Amazon.com. Worst comes to worst, buy it from the Coop or Quantum Books, which are the main bookstores in Kendall Square. The Coop is guaranteed to have your textbook and if you get there early you can buy a used copy. Also, its been my experience that you dont need the book right away, so if you have to have it shipped online then its usually not a big deal. Ohone last thing. A lot of classes have Course Notes, which are sold at the Copy Tech. Theyre usually between $20-40 and just consist of nicely bound notes or your problem sets for the semester. Your professor will tell if you need them. So dont run out and buy textbooks yet! Wait until you get to school, are sure of your classes, and hear which books the professor wants you to get. Usually you can buy older editions of textbooks for a lot less, but sometimes the professors want you to get the newest one.

Ethics And Morality Are The Same Thing - 812 Words

When discussing ethics, people often think ethics and morality are the same thing. But in order to understand ethical leadership, it can be beneficial to view these two concepts differently. One of the most important ethical philosophers of modern times has been John Rawls, who made a clear distinction between comprehensive moral systems and less comprehensive systems. The distinction can help better understand the idea of ethical leadership. To Rawls, the two differ in the following manner: †¢ Comprehensive moral systems cover not just one’s behaviour, but also bigger issues such as where one’s place is in the universe. These moral systems would include the world’s religions, for example. †¢ Less comprehensive moral systems would only cover areas of politics, social, and economics. Therefore, morality is generally based on much broader set of values and beliefs. These can or cannot be logically coherent. Whereas ethics is based on social norms, following coherent philosophical principles. Nonetheless, morality can form a basis for ethical leadership, such as ethical leadership. The modern context of ethical leadership Ethical leadership is essentially a leadership theory, which uses the above ethics concepts as a guide to managing subordinates. Since ethics deals with the principles of ‘right’ behaviour and leadership with influencing other people to achieve goals, ethical leadership is influencing people through ethics. The rise of ethical leadership can be traced backShow MoreRelatedEthics: Moral Absolutes Essay1180 Words   |  5 PagesEthics 3.1 1. Why are Christian ethics and theology inseparable? What did Francis Schaeffer mean when he said that not all things are the same to God? Christian ethics is inseparable from theology because it is grounded in the character of God. Francis Schaeffer said that not all things are the same to God and means that God exists and has a character, but not all things are the same to him. Some things conform to His character, and some are opposed to his character. 2. What did Schaeffer concludeRead MoreSummary Of Morality Play And Harrison Bergeron1215 Words   |  5 Pagesallowed? Ethics is having rules of what others people have conducted. Some examples are the bill of rights or state laws. Morals are a set of rules you make personally. Both of these terms decided how a person will act and decides it from right or wrong. Many appear during the stories of â€Å"Morality Play† and â€Å"Harrison Bergeron†. The difference between ethics and morality is that ethics controls the individuals while morality is when the individual is in control. The characters in â€Å"Morality Play† andRead MoreAs Clearly And Carefully As You Can1326 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿Voluntarists and non-voluntarists have had intense debate on the issue of religion and morality. The underlying central argument of the debate is whether the morality requires a religious foundation or not. While the voluntarists claim that morality does require a relig ious foundation, non-voluntarists assert that it doesn’t. David Brink and George Mavrodes argues with this theme of voluntarist and non-voluntarist. My essay will largely focus on the strengths and weakness of both voluntarists andRead MoreEthics And Principles Of Ethics991 Words   |  4 Pages Ethics is a system basic moral principals and concepts of civilized human conduct. it helps us develop ideas about what is moral, right from wrong and dictates of conscience. Ethics also helps to distinguish between honest and dishonest characteristics in people. In business, ethics is something that is essential to one’s moral compass. It is something that is taught through the child rearing process and into a child’s formative years. Ethics requires knowledge. Fundamentally this suggests thatRead MoreEthics : Ethics And Morality1476 Words   |  6 Pagesuniversal on ethics and morality. Ethics among different cultures is so vast, even though every culture does have a standard for ethics which they live by. Although ethics is a broad human universal, there is no specific universal ethic. Each world religion holds a different ethic as their highest ethic; it is always a case by case basis. Theory: Ethics serve as an adaptive function in modern environment, more than ever. As society evolves, the standard of ethics also increases. Ethics is a traitRead MoreThe Relationship Between Religion and Ethics Essay972 Words   |  4 PagesTo answer this question, we must first understand what both ethics and morality are. As ethics is defined as the philosophical study of morality, those who study religion get their moral precepts from what they believe God says should be done. This perspective is not at all unexpected, because all religions apply a perspective on morality. Morality is defined as beliefs concerning right and wrong, good and bad- beliefs that can include judgements, values, rules, principles, and theories. Morals areRead MoreThe Doctrine Of The Divine Command Theory1488 Words   |  6 Pageschurches moral teaching of value only to Catholics or to everyone, and either way, why? Christian morality is centered on assessing the ethical implications of us as people. Who we ought and be, and what actions we ought to take or avoid based on an understanding of the scripture and relevant human experiences. I do not subscribe to the divine command theory (DCT) of ethics, as I believe you can have ethics without God. The DCT proposes that what is morally right is what God has commanded (for exampleRead MoreEssay on Contrasting Kand and Hume on Morality1510 Words   |  7 PagesMorality is central to all rational beings, whereby a moral action is one determined by reason, rather than our personal desires as suggested by Kant (1785) in contrast to Hume. (1738). Furthermore, Kant suggests that an action is moral only on account of its being reasoned, therefore the moral worth of an action is determined by its motives and not by its consequences. Exploring the works of Hume (1738) and Kant(1785) on morality and ethics, we will ask the question whether we should do what isRead MoreRuth Benedict813 Words   |  4 PagesAre Ethics Relative? Ruth Benedict: Ethics Are Relative ID # : 0804014743 â€Å"Ruth Benedict: Ethics Are Relative †¦ Morality is culturally relative.† In this paper, I’m going to discuss the argument that the famous American anthropologist, Ruth Benedict, has put forth regarding ‘ethical relativism’. Ethical relativism is the theory that holds that morality is relative to the norms and values of ones culture or society. That is, whether an action is classified as right or wrong depends on the moralRead More Gender and Philosophy Class: Whose Job is it Anyways1244 Words   |  5 PagesEthics of care, maternal thinking and morality are all very important aspects that should be involved in all aspects of society, but most of all today’s gendered workforce. Both men and women should receive equal rights and same treatment in the workplace, from equal opportunity to equal pay. Ethics of care, maternal thinking and morality should be applied in full when developing fairness in the workforce because of the great points it brings up about our flaws in societal development. The unfairness

The Use Of Testing For Doping Controls Using A Quadrupole...

Analysis of Prohibited Drugs in Blood for Doping Controls using a Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer 1-Introduction 1.1-Use of prohibited drugs in competitive sports 1.2-Commonly tested analytes for doping control 1.3-Techniques employed 2-Sampling 2.1-Sample preparation 3-Experimental Techniques 3.1-LC/MS 3.2-LC/TMS 4-Latest Advancements in the field 4.1-Sensitivity 4.2-Accuracy 4.3-Automation 5-Conclusion 6-References Figures and Tables Fig: 1 Fig: 2 Fig: 3 Fig: 4 Table: 1 Table: 2 ABSTRACT The use of performance enhancers and prohibited drugs in sports goes back as far as the year 1889 when Pud Galvin a Pittsburgh’s baseball pitcher used performance enhancer before pitching in a game against Boston. Pud used something called â€Å"Elixir of Brown Sequard† containing mostly testosterone drained from the gonads of an animal. The use of performance enhancers may seem natural in terms of gaining an edge in a competition but the attached strings may far outweigh its advantages. Mostly the short-term benefits of gaining advantage are associated with the long-term health risks of the athlete. The attached health vulnerability of the athletes underpins the need of strict regularization code for performance enhancers through robust, precise and accurate analytical techniques. We will discuss and compare various analytical challenges encountered during doping control analysis in this report. Sampling is the first to start with. A good sampling

The Vietnam War Free Essays

The Vietnam War Free Essays War is always a controversial topic whenever it is discussed in a political setting, or even a private conversation between friends. No War has ever been a more controversial than the Vietnam War. The Vietnam War was the longest War the nation has ever engaged in. We will write a custom essay sample on The Vietnam War or any similar topic only for you Order Now The United States entered the war in 1961 and pulled out in 1975. Although the death toll did not reach as high as the civil war, or either World War One, or World War two. The Nation still lost over fifty thousand soldiers in the deadly conflict. After World War two the French returned to controlling Indochina, but democracy in all areas of Indochina were not welcomed. Ho Chi Minh tried to downplay the tension to Washington, and show his respect for democracy, but a resistance was formed against the French. The French army and their American advisors seriously underestimated the Vietnamese Independence League and thought a victory would be easy. In 1953, President Eisenhower sent military aid to the French along with military advisors to Vietnam to prevent a Communist victory. However, a year later in 1954, around 10,000 French soldiers surrenders after a crucial battle at Dein Bein Phu at which around 8000 Viet Minh and 1500 French soldiers died. After this crucial loss the French decided to pull out completely after eight long and bitter years of fighting. The Americans at this point, had already invested billions of dollars in aid to the French and decide to enter and to step up their presence in Vietnam heavily. The U. S. main objective upon entering the war was to stop the spread of communism and to put a halt to the â€Å"domino† theory. In 1961, Soviet premier Nikita Khrushchev called the Vietnam War a ‘wars of national liberation’ and greatly supported communist in North Vietnam under Ho Chi Minh. Heavy volumes of U. S. roops began to arrive in South Vietnam in 1961, as well as economic aid. The Americans showed their support to the President Ngo Dinh Nheim and joined forces against the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong. By 1961, The United States were heavily involved with the war both in military and in economic support. John F. Kennedy became president and virtually inherited this new war. Kennedy s aw the Vietnam War as another by product of the Cold War. Kennedy became excited about using his military, and his â€Å"flexible response â€Å"military strategy. The Army began a new training program in counter insurgency called Special Forces. Like a kid with a new toy, Kennedy was eager to use his new elite, unconventional small armed tactical soldiers named the Green Berets in the jungles of Vietnam. â€Å"Despite American aid, the corrupt and repressive Diem regime installed by Eisenhower in 1954 was losing ground†. (Henretta, 830) The North Vietnamese had formed a revolutionary movement called the â€Å"National Liberation Front†. (Henretta, 830) The National Liberation Front (NLF) had their own specialized guerilla warfare soldiers known as the Vietcong, and they were fighting in their backyard. Once again, the Americans had not fully realized what they were up against. We had not learned the lesson from the French, and even with more troops on the ground and Special Forces Green Berets in the fight, the North Vietnamese were collecting one small victory after another. This was an unconventional type of warfare that America was not prepared for in more ways than one. When talking about guerilla warfare this is one rule that must be followed to have a successful guerilla campaign. When a smaller force is going up against a larger force, and are outnumbered and out gunned they must follow this rule to have any sort of real success. Guerilla warfare is primarily composed of shoot and move, hide and seek tactics. These tactics will work very well if you have support from the surrounding civilian populous. â€Å"The NLF’s guerilla forces-the Vietcong –found a receptive audience among peasants alienated by Diem’s strategic hamlet program, which uprooted whole villages and moved them to barbed -wire compounds . â€Å"(Henretta, 830) To further separate the natives from the American interest and Diem, militant Buddhist monks began protest in dramatic fashion. These protest included self- immolation and were captured on film by American television crews. Eventually Diem was overthrown and assassinated; this was not something that was anticipated by Kennedy. By this time, the United States had around 16,000 ‘advisors’ from helicopter crews to Green Berets. President Kennedy was at a point of putting full responsibility on South Vietnam for winning their own war and completely pulling out all U. S. aid. In a CBS interview â€Å"Kennedy had remarked that it was up to the South Vietnamese whether there would be won or lost. †(Henretta, 830) History will never know if Kennedy really would have pulled out of Vietnam like he hinted he had plans of doing so. On November 22, 1963 President Kennedy was shot and killed in Dallas Texas. Kennedy’s closest advisors argue that is exactly what he was planning on doing , but we will never know, and to some that argument downplays the stakes of what the Vietnam was really about and what it represented. â€Å"The United States was now engaged in a Global War against communism. Giving up in Vietnam would weaken America’s credibility. And under the prevailing domino theory, other pro-American states would topple after Vietnam’s loss. (Henretta, 830) Just as Kennedy inherited the Vietnam War from Eisenhower, Lyndon B Johnson had now inherited it from Kennedy. Although Kennedy may have been planning a full removal of U. S. troops and economic aid. However, it was almost a completly different war than what Kennedy first inherited. Johnson knew by this point that preventing the fall of South Vietnam would take a large scale military force that had not been committed to South Vietnam . This was not an option for Johnson who was a firm believer in global containment. In fact, this was his position upon taking office. I am not going to lose Vietnam; I am not going to be the president who saw Southeast Asia goes the way China went. ’(Henretta, 835) Johnson was a bit of a sneaky fellow; he kept his foreign affairs out of the limelight, and had a tendency to do the complete opposite of what he said he would do when dealing with the Vietnam War. He did not think the American populous would have the stomach, or the will to do what he ultimately thought was necessary. In 1964, Johnson ran on the pledge that there would be no escalation, and that â€Å"no American boys fighting Vietnams fight. (Henretta, 835) Well Johnson being a slick talker, said one thing and did another. In the summer of 1964, Johnson got reports that North Vietnamese torpedo boats had fired on the U. S. destroyer the Maddox. â€Å"In the first attack, on August 2, the damage inflicted was limited to a single bullet hole; a second, on August 4, later proved to be misread radar sightings. The specifics of the ‘attacks’ really did not matter; this is all Johnson needed to sensationalize. A classic strategy used through the military in U. S. military. Whether or not this was a necessary man ever to encourage U. S. involvement in Vietnam a debatable. None the less, Johnson’s request to â€Å"take all necessary measures to repel any armed attack against the forces of the United States and to prevent further aggression† was popularly voted in by Congress. The Gulf of Tonkin resolution gave President Johnson the authority to conduct operations in Vietnam as he saw fit. In 1964 Johnson had successfully put the elections behind him. Now he could really get to work on the American takeover in Vietnam. The escalation took on two forms in 1965 and really got rolling. The first form of escalation was the deployment of American troops. The Second form was the increased bombing of North Vietnam. In early 1965, U. S. Marines were patrolling the shores of Da Nang, their main objective was to protect an American air base there, but they would soon find themselves in fire fights with the enemy. â€Å"By 1966, more than 380,000 U. S. soldiers were stationed in Vietnam; by 1967, 485,000; and by 1968, 536,000. †(Henretta, 837) The request of more and more troops in Vietnam by General William Westmoreland, commander of the U. S. orces in Vietnam, was a fear that President Kennedy had right before he had died. His comparison of requesting more troops was compared to having another drink of alcohol. â€Å"The effect wears off then you have to take another. †(Henretta, 837) Other than mass amounts of troops being deployed in Vietnam, another type of escalation was in full swing. Operation rolling thunder was a bombing campaign against North Vietn am. The Hoi Chi Minth trail was an elaborate series of trails, bridges and shelters that stretched from North Vietnam, to Cambodia, all the way over to Laos in South Vietnam. This trail was a specific bombing target in operation rolling thunder. â€Å"800 tons a day for three and a half years. † (Henretta, 837) By 1968, a million tons had fallen on the North Vietnamese! Around twice that was dropped in the south trying to drive out the Vietcong fighters. Americans did not have a true sense of the enemy they were fighting. They thought that this incredible amount of firepower that was dropped on them would break there will. The American strategist also thought that a combination of severe bombing campaigns, mixed with the vast amount of U. S. troops on the ground would ultimately break the will of the Vietnamese and lead to surrender. This would prove to be the exact opposite at the war goes on. The Vietcong prove to be more resilient and adapt to American tactics. The Vietcong began moving their munitions underground and began constructing a network of tunnels. Operation rolling thunder herded the Vietcong’s will to fight as a result. The No rth Vietnamese proved that they were willing to loose everything to win this war. The Americans did not have the dame convictions in this particular conflict. This is a classic rule of warfare that the Americans arrogantly ignored because they thought they had significant fire power and numbers. This would take a toll on the average ‘grunt’ on day to day operations. The massive bombing campaigns took a horrific toll on the Vietnamese countryside. After on particular harsh and unusual engagement with the North Vietnamese a commanding officer was quoted as saying â€Å"it became necessary to destroy the town in order to save it. ’(Henretta, 837) This was the logic at the time for fighting guerilla warfare. This was not a conscript ‘grunt’s’ opinion, this was the report of a commanding officer. The bombing campaigns were thought to do more than just remove strategic targets. They were also used to reduce resources to the Vietcong, as well as reduce the amount of available jungle for them to hide in. Chemicals were also used to destroy vegetation. One Chemical known as ‘Agent Orange’ was released to kill vegetation. This chemical was later found to be highly toxic to not just plant life, but to humans as well. Many Vietnam veterans have had serious complications as a result of contact with ‘Agent Orange’. American policy makers and strategist, as well as Johnson’s advisors were left scratching their heads as the North Vietnamese proved them a worthy adversary. We could just not find a way to win the war. Or could we not find an easy way to win the war? Some argued that a reform in Saigon was necessary to turn the tide of the war. Others argued that America had not fully committed to winning this war with a full scale invasion of North Korea, and possibly a war with China. In my humble opinion, that is exactly what we needed to do if we were over there fighting and dying in the first place. Otherwise just pack the boys up and send them home. Johnson was ultimately hoping that we would win the war of attrition and hope that American firepower would be the ultimate deciding factor. Johnson was very confident in the beginning years of the Vietnam War. Steady consensus polls showed full American support of the Cold War and the escalation of Vietnam in 1965, and in 1966. However, these numbers began to shift, as the war raged on. American had become weary of seeing nightly news broadcast of American soldiers being killed and seriously wounded. Journalists began to write about a â€Å"credibility gap† and were accusing the Johnson Administration of shielding a lot of the truths of the war. The Johnson administration also began to take a lot of heat from the sheer cost of the war by American taxpayers. â€Å"The Vietnam war cost the taxpayers $27 billion dollars in 1967, pushing the national deficit from $9. 8 billion to $23 billion. †(Henretta, 839) This access of military spending pushed inflation upward. This would end up plaguing the U. S. economy well throughout the seventies. Out of this economic frustration antiwar demonstrations were on the up rise. At the core of the anti-war voice was a long standing pacifist group known as SANE. SANE, was one of the major protestors of nuclear testing done in the atmosphere in the 1950’s. They gained momentum and were joined by many sets of people. Student groups, clergy, and civil rights activist had all joined the anti-war movement. The movement spread like wildfire and they had grown by enough numbers to put on mass anti-war protest bringing out as many as 30,000 protestors at a time. â€Å"Although they were a diverse lot, participants in these rallies shared skepticism about U. S. policy in Vietnam. They charged variously that intervention was antithetical to American ideals; that an independent, anti-communist South Vietnam was unattainable; and that no American objective justified the suffering that was being inflicted on the Vietnamese people. †(Henretta, 839) The war raged on and so did the protest. President Johnson through a dice and gambled that the Vietnam War would be a relatively quick victory by the second escalation. There was no such victory to be had been won. Ultimately the unrest of the American people forced the U. S. to withdraw its troops from Vietnam. How to cite The Vietnam War, Papers

Case Study of Bank One free essay sample

The report is expected to be between 10 to 15 pages excluding table of content, introduction and appendix. The content includes two parts: A. 1 Page summary of the case Summary significantly longer than 1 page will lead to grade reduction. B. One of the following question set Group 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 – Question set 1 Group 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 – Question set 2 QUESTION SET 1 If Banc One wanted to manage its interest rate exposure without using swaps, what could it do? Specifically, how could it move from being asset-sensitive to either neutral or mildly liability-sensitive without using swaps? What are the pros and cons of using swaps vs. these other means of adjusting the banks interest rate sensitivity? What impact do they have on the banks interest rate sensitivity, liquidity, accounting ratios, and capital ratios? QUESTION SET 2 What is the structure of asset and liability of Banc One and its implication for interest rate risk? What is the role of ALCO in asset and liability management process? Discuss the dilemma that Banc One’s management faced in dealing with the bank’s falling stock price. We will write a custom essay sample on Case Study of Bank One or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page What are the possible solutions to solve their problem presented in the Case? What is your opinion about these solutions? 3. AUTHENTICATION Please honor the academic integrity code by ensuring the authentication of the work. Failure to do so will lead to significant reduction of your grade. 4. PEER ASSESSMENT There will be a peer assessment for the project. Each member will fill out an assessment for yourself and other members in your group. Your grade will be calculated = 80% project grade + 20% peer assessment + bonus (if eligible) Please see email for direction to receive bonus on the project.